From: | Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: AtEOXact_ApplyLauncher() and subtransactions |
Date: | 2018-06-26 10:25:33 |
Message-ID: | CAJ3gD9eM9RyNfup41HtxY8GGQ9qVPkO8U0wG0Xgn2oe4TLFOZw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Added this into the July 2018 commitfest :
http://commitfest.postgresql.org/18/1696/
On 20 June 2018 at 22:22, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 18 June 2018 at 15:02, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 16 June 2018 at 00:03, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> The way I am implementing this can be seen in attached
>>> apply_launcher_subtrans_WIP.patch. (check launcher.c changes). I
>>> haven't started testing it yet though.
>>
>> Attached patch passes some basic testing I did. Will do some more
>> testing, and some self-review and code organising, if required.
>
> Done. Attached is v2 version of the patch. Comments welcome.
>
> Changed GetSubscriptionRelations() to GetSubscriptionRelids(), which
> now returns only the oids, not the subrel states. This was convenient
> for storing the exact returned list into the committed subscription
> rels. And anyways the subrel states were not used anywhere.
>
>> I will also split the patch into two : one containing the main issue
>> regarding subtransaction, and the other containing the other issue I
>> mentioned earlier that shows up without subtransaction as well.
>
> Did not split the patch. The changes for the other issue that shows up
> without subtransaction are all in subscriptioncmds.c , and that file
> contains mostly the changes for this issue. So kept it as a single
> patch. But if it gets inconvenient for someone while reviewing, I will
> be happy to split it.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> -Amit Khandekar
> EnterpriseDB Corporation
> The Postgres Database Company
--
Thanks,
-Amit Khandekar
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2018-06-26 10:31:12 | Re: [WIP] [B-Tree] Retail IndexTuple deletion |
Previous Message | Ideriha, Takeshi | 2018-06-26 10:14:37 | RE: ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on pg_dump |