| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Cc: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Do not check unlogged indexes on standby |
| Date: | 2020-02-06 15:59:09 |
| Message-ID: | 20200206155909.GA9007@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Feb-05, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> The second item genereated another thread a little after this thread.
> Everything was handled on this other thread. Ultimately, I rejected
> the enhancement on the grounds that it wasn't safe on standbys in the
> face of concurrent splits and deletions [1].
>
> I believe that all of the items discussed on this thread have been
> resolved. Did I miss a CF entry or something?
Nah. I just had one of the messages flagged in my inbox, and I wasn't
sure what had happened since the other thread was not referenced in this
one. I wasn't looking at any CF entries.
Thanks for the explanation,
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-02-06 16:03:51 | Re: In PG12, query with float calculations is slower than PG11 |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2020-02-06 14:44:26 | Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index |